Unayo i-1.9 yezigidi zeedola ezandleni zekhaya elitsha? Ngaba ulungile ngeVictorian enamagumbi okulala amahlanu eza namanye, masithi, yimbali? Ungathini ukuba bendinokuxelela ukuba ibikhe yahlaselwa? Kuyavela, ndinyanzelekile ngokwasemthethweni ukwenza loo nto-kwaye indlu edume kakubi eyenza ukuba eso sibophelelo sicace siyathengiswa.
Ngoku, kunzima ukuhlala kwindlu eneziporho (nokuba isiporho ingaba yinkampani elungileyo), kwaye kunzima ngakumbi ukuyithengisa. Abathengi abaninzi ngokuqondakalayo abafuni kungena kunye nomoya, okanye ukuba bayathandabuza, basenokungakuthandi ukuhlala kwindawo eyaziwayo kwiindawo zalapha ekhaya ukuba zihanjiswe kwaye zinokutsala ezinye ii-gawkers. Ke mhlawumbi, ukuba uthengisa indlu, ngekhe uxelele abathengi! Yiloo nto awayecinga ngayo uHelen Ackley xa wayethengisa ikhaya lakhe laseNyack, eNew York ngo-1989, kwaye ukusilela kwakhe ukuveza imbali yekhaya lakhe kwakhokelela ekubeni adume kakubi. Ghostbusters olawulayo .
Xa uJeffrey Stambovsky wathenga eli khaya e-Ackley, wala ukummxelela ngembali epheleleyo ye-Victorian charmer eyabuyela kwiminyaka ye-1890. Ikhaya, elibekwe kwindawo eyi-1 LaVeta , yayihlaselwe kakubi ngendlela engathandekiyo, into ababengayazi ii-Ackleys xa beyithenga ngoo-1960, kodwa bahlangabezana nayo. Baye bathi, phakathi kwezinye izinto, ukubona isiporho apho kwaye umandlalo wabo washukuma rhoqo. Kodwa kuba kungekho mntu ubaxelelayo ngemini, bathi cwaka xa bethengisa eStambovsky. Wayengenguye umntu wasekhaya-ngekhe azi.
Kodwa wafumanisa kwaye, ngelixa indlu yayiku-escrow, wagqiba kwelokuba akafuni kuhlala kwindlu eneziporho, ebuyile ekuthengeni, kwaye wafuna intlawulo yakhe ephantsi. UAckley wala ukumvumela ukuba aphume kwisivumelwano okanye abuyisele imali, kwaza kwavela ityala. Ityala lahamba laya kwiNkundla ePhakamileyo yaseNew York ngombuzo wokuba ingaba umthengi angaphuma na kwisivumelwano ngenxa yokuba umthengisi engakhange achaze ukuba indlu ihlaselwe, kwaye inkundla yathi… ewe.
Kwisigwebo esivuyisa ngokwenene, iNkundla ePhakamileyo yaseNew York yathi: ekulandeleni iyeza elisemthethweni lokumela inkohliso kumthengisi, ummangali akanalo ithuba, kodwa ndichukunyiswa ngumoya wolingano ukuvumela umthengi ukufuna ukurhoxiswa kwesivumelwano sokuthengisa kunye nokufumana kwakhona intlawulo yakhe.
Inkundla yagweba ngale ndlela kuba eli khaya lalibandakanyiwe kuhambo lokuhamba lwezindlu ezikhuselweyo kwaye lada laboniswa kumaphephancwadi indawo engenabantu, eyayiquka udliwanondlebe no-Ackley. Ngenxa yokuba ebambe indlu njenge-hauned eshicilelwe, u-Ackley akazange avunyelwe ukubukhanyela ubukho beziporho zabahlali.
Inkundla ibhale: njengomthetho, indlu ihanjisiwe. Esona sizathu sokuba eli tyala lifundiswe kwizikolo zomthetho kwilizwe liphela, nangona kunjalo, kukufikelela kumbono wento ekufuneka ichazwe kwizivumelwano. Abathengi kufuneka balumke, kodwa abathengisi banomsebenzi wokuxela izinto ezibalulekileyo-njengeziporho, ngokucacileyo.
Ukusukela kwisigqibo sika-1991, indlu eseLaveta iye yaduma ngakumbi, kwaye ngoku kunjalo buyela emarikeni , Uluhlu lwe- $ 1.9 yezigidi ezipholileyo. Igumbi lokulala le-5, ibhafu ye-5, i-4,629 yeenyawo zekhaya liyamangalisa, kodwa ngasizathu sithile, ayikathengisi. Lihlazo eli, kuthathelwa ingqalelo omnye wabahlali bayo bangaphambili (bendalo) yayiyimvumi uIngrid Michaelson, owayibiza ngokuba ikhaya lemilingo . Kubukeka buhle ngokwenene, kwaye ngubani ongafuni ukuhlala kwindawo enjalo?
Okumangalisayo kukuba, udweliso lweli khaya alubandakanyi imbali yesiporho okanye yezomthetho ngokubhekisele kwityala le-Stambovsky v. Ackley, kodwa ndicinga ukuba umthengisi uza kwazisa abathengi ngaphambi kokuba bangene kwisivumelwano- kungenjalo abahlali abatsha banokuba Ndothuka kakhulu. Kwaye xa bejonga ukuba ngubani oza kubiza? impendulo inokuba ligqwetha.
(umfanekiso: iZillow)
Ngaba ufuna amanye amabali anje? Yiba ngumbhalisi kwaye uxhase indawo!
-UMary Sue unemigaqo-nkqubo engqongqo yokuphawula engavumiyo, kodwa ayikhawulelwanga, ukuthukwa nabani na , Intiyo nentetho egonyamelayo. —
