Kwisithuba seminyaka engaphezulu kwekhulu, iintlobo zobugcisa bezizibuza ukuba ingaba isigwebo esincinci esibhalwe ipensile siphele njani kwenye yeenguqulelo zikaEdvard Munch's The Scream. Umyalezo, ongafumanekiyo kwangoko kumzobo, ufundeka ngekhe upeyintwe ligeza.
Ngoku, emva kohlalutyo olupheleleyo lombhalo wesandla obandakanya ukufota kwe-infrared, abagadi baseNorway IMyuziyam kaZwelonke yoBugcisa, uLwakhiwo kunye noYilo , engumnini wale nguqulelo yesi sikhalo, bagqibe kwelokuba umyalezo awuzange ushiywe sisitenxo, njengoko kudala kucingwa, kodwa akekho omnye ngaphandle kukaMunch ngokwakhe.
Njengoko INew York Times iingxelo :
Kuye kwahlolwa ngoku ngenyameko, ileta ngeleta, kunye negama ngelizwi, kwaye iyafana ngandlela zonke ekubhaleni ngesandla sikaMunch, utshilo uMai Britt Guleng, umgcini wemyuziyam yeenkosi zakudala kunye nepeyinti zangoku, owayephethe uphando. Ke akusekho kuthandabuza.
Ngokuqinisekileyo oku kuyavakala! Iziphumo zemyuziyam ziphikisana nokucinga okwenziwa ngababhali-mbali bezobugcisa amashumi eminyaka ukuba yayilundwendwe olungathandekiyo lwemyuziyam olwabhala la mazwi-mhlawumbi njengoluhlobo lwezimvo ezisekwe kuluvo kwipropathi esiza kuyivelisa ngoku kuTwitter kunokuba ipensile.
Kubonakala ukuba yayinguMunch ngokwenene owashiya umyalezo-kwaye oku ngoku kubonakala kunjalo-ebengazimiselanga ukuba, kulungile, kubhalwe okukhulu. Umgcini weMyuziyam kaZwelonke uGuleng ucacisele i Amaxesha , Akazange ayibhale ngoonobumba abakhulu ukuba babonwe ngumntu wonke. Kuya kufuneka ujonge nzima ukuyibona. Ukuba ibisisenzo sokonakaliswa, ngekwakukhulu. Umyalezo ukhona kuphela kuhlobo lwango-1893 lweThe Scream, eyayiyeyokuqala ukuba uMunch azobe. Ekugqibeleni wayeza kugqiba ukuboniswa kwe-Scream iyonke kwisithuba seminyaka elishumi elinesixhenxe phakathi kuka-1893 no-1910.
Iingcali zeMunch zikholelwa ukuba umyalezo wawenzelwe ngokungathandabuzekiyo, kwaye inokuba ikhuthazwe sisigameko se-1895 emva komboniso wokuqala weSikhalo. Ngexesha lengxoxo ngomsebenzi kaMunch, umfundi wezobugqirha wabhengeza ukuba lo msebenzi wobugcisa wamnika isizathu sokubuza imeko yengqondo yomzobi, ebiza uMunch ngokungaqhelekanga kwaye 'ephambene.' UMunch wayekhathazeke kakhulu. Munch wayenayo ubudlelwane obuntsonkothileyo ngempilo yengqondo kulo lonke ixesha lobomi bakhe, kodwa ukubhala lo mbhalo kubonakala ngathi bekungokugwetywa kwe-arhente yakhe kunokuba kugwetywe ngaphandle.
U-Guleng ukholelwa ekubeni lo mbhalo ubhalwe ngendlela ehlekisayo kwaye ubonakalisa iintlungu xa ehlaselwa kwaye esoyika ukuthathwa njengogula ngengqondo. Ngokubhala lo mbhalo emafini, wayithimba, ngandlela thile, okanye wathabatha ulawulo lokuba wayeza kubonwa kwaye aqondwe njani, utshilo.
UMaite van Dijk, umgcini womboniso we-2015 Munch / Van Gogh kwiVan Gogh Museum eAmsterdam, ubonakala ngathi uyavumelana, exelela Amaxesha , Iyadida kakhulu into ayenzayo. Ingaba ngumbuzo ongathandabuzekiyo, okanye ingaba yingxelo. Ngubani obuza umbuzo? Ngaba ubeka umgxeki, okanye uluntu? Leyo yinxalenye yento yonke eyenziwa nguMunch. Uthetha emfihlekweni kwaye enganiki mpendulo icacileyo.
Ngelixa le mfihlakalo yokuvela komyalezo kusenokwenzeka ukuba isonjululwe, konke akunakwenzeka ukutsho ngokuqinisekileyo ukuba yintoni eyashukumisela uEdvard Munch ukuba athabathe intetho enjalo kwinto eya kuthi ekugqibeleni ibe ngomnye wemisebenzi yobugcisa eyaziwayo neyaziwayo emhlabeni.
Kukho ukwaneliseka okuthile, nangona kunjalo, ukubona umbuzo oneminyaka elikhulu ubudala uphendulwa ngokufunda ngenkuthalo kunye nenkqubela phambili kwitekhnoloji. Kwaye Isikhalo siyaqhubeka nokuvakala kuyo yonke iminyaka kunye nabaphulaphuli kwihlabathi liphela nge-angst ekhoyo kunye neyangaphandle; mhlawumbi akuzange kubekho ixesha elifanelekileyo lokuyijonga kwakhona ngoku.
(nge INew York Times , imifanekiso: UMario Roberto Duran Ortiz (Ifoto ngu-Wikimedia Commons)
