Ngokwale Ngcali yeengqondo, uSherlock Holmes akanguye uSociopath kwaphela

Ingcali yeengqondo UMaria Konnikova Ixutywe yingxoxo ethile eqhubeka USherlock . Ngoba? Ngaba iyimfihlakalo yeziganeko ezichanekileyo zonyaka wesithathu wokugqibela? Ngaba yintiyo yangaphambi kokungabinanto amanye amacandelo obukrelekrele kubonakala ngathi ayilelwe ii-CBS Eyokuqala ? Isihogo, ingaba uyazibuza ukuba ngubani UBenedict Cumberbatch idlala kwi I-Star Trek 2 ?

Hayi, yinto eyenza ingqiqo kude kunikwe umsebenzi wakhe: UKonnikova angathanda ukuba sonke siyeke ukubhekisa kuHolmes njenge-sociopath. Kuba ngokwengxoxo yakhe enyanzelisayo, akakho.

Kukho umboniso , kumqhubi wenqwelomoya (Isifundo ngePinki) ye-BBC USherlock , apho i-minion yamapolisa kunye nameva aqhubekayo e-Holme Anderson abiza uSherlock njenge-psychopath. Imivimbo yethu ekhokelayo ejikeleze, konke ukuphinda kugxeke: Andiyiyo i-psychopath, uAnderson, ndiyintlalontle esebenzayo ephezulu, yenza uphando lwakho!

Umzuzu awukhunjulwa, phakathi kwabaninzi bakaSherlock (oh, ezininzi ukubuya kwakhona, ukubonisa into ebonakala ngathi yeyona nto iphambili ekwazisweni komlinganiswa. Kodwa ngokukaKonnikova, kukho ubuxoki obuninzi obenziwa ngotshintshiselwano ( Isicatshulwa esipheleleyo sinokufumaneka apha ):

USherlock Holmes akayena intlalontle. Akayiyo nentlalontle esebenza njengomphezulu, njengeyona nto ibalaseleyo kwi-BBC USherlock umbhale ngegama (ndiwathatha ngqo amazwi emlonyeni kaBenedict Cumberbatch). Pha. Nditshilo.

Okokuqala, ii-psychopaths kunye nentlalontle zizinto ezifanayo. Akukho mahluko. Nantoni na. I-Psychopathy ligama elisetyenzisiweyo kuncwadi lwangoku lweklinikhi, ngelixa intlalontle ligama eliqulunqwe ngu-G. E. Partridge kwi1930 ukugxininisa ukophula umthetho kwezoluntu kwaye oko kungasasebenzi. Ukuba ezi zinto zimbini zixutywe kukusetyenziswa okulihlazo, kwaye uSherlock uqhubela phambili nokudideka ngakumbi. Okwesibini kuko konke, akukho psychopath-okanye sociopath eyiyo, ukuba wena (okanye uHolmes) uyakuze uyamkele ingqondo yakhe.

U-Konnikova uqhubeka nokuchaza ukuba yintoni eya kuvavanyo lwee-sociopaths, uninzi lwezinto ezikuluhlu lubonakala ngathi zisebenza kumcuphi wethu odumileyo.

NgokukaKonnikova, nangona kunjalo, kukho umahluko ophambili. Ukuthetha ngokubanda kwakhe ngokukodwa:

Ukubanda kukaHolmes akuyonto yohlobo [efumaneka kwii-psychopaths eziyinyani]. Akunjalo ukuba akafumani nayiphi na imvakalelo. Kungenxa yokuba uziqeqeshile ukuba angavumeli iimvakalelo zisibekele isohlwayo-into ayiphindayo rhoqo kuWatson. In the Sign of Four, khumbula indlela uHolmes asabela ngayo kuMary Morstan: Ndicinga ukuba lelinye lawona manenekazi amnandi endakha ndadibana nawo. Uyamfumana uyathandeka, emva koko. Kodwa ayisiyiyo yonke into ayithethayo. Kodwa uthando luyinto eneemvakalelo, kwaye nantoni na evakalelwa ngokuchasene neso sizathu sibandayo endisibeka ngaphezu kwazo zonke izinto, uqhubeka uHolmes. Ngaba uSherlock wayengu-psychopath, akukho nanye kwezi ngxelo yayinokwenza nayiphi na intsingiselo. Wayengayi kusilela kuphela ukuqaphela umtsalane kaMariya kunye nefuthe lawo elinokubakho kwiimvakalelo, kodwa ngekhe akwazi ukwenza umahluko awenzayo phakathi kwesizathu esibandayo kunye nemvakalelo eshushu. Ingqele kaHolmes iyafundwa. Yenziwe ngabom. Kukuzilungisa rhoqo (uyaphawula ukuba uMariya uyathandeka, emva koko uyayigxotha; akachaphazeleki kumzuzu wokuqala, kuphela xa eyivuma uyilahla ecaleni imvakalelo yakhe).

Ngaphezu, ukubanda kukaHolmes kuswele izinto ezinxulumene nokungabi naluvelwano, ukungazisoli, kunye nokusilela ukuthatha uxanduva. Uvelwano, akufuneki sijonge ngaphezulu kunendlela awaphendula ngayo enxebeni likaWatson kwiThe Three Garridebs, (Awonzakalanga, Watson? Ngenxa kaThixo, yithi awonzakaliswanga!) - okanye umnqweno wakhe wokuvumela izaphuli-mthetho ezithile zihambe zikhululekile , ukuba ubukhulu becala abamsulwa ekugwebeni kwakhe. Ukuzisola, cinga ityala lakhe lokurhuqela uWatson engxakini xa imeko ininzi kakhulu (kunye nokuxolisa kwakhe ngokumothusa kwiNdlu engenanto. Ingqina: Ndinetyala kuwe eliwaka. Bendingazi ukuba uyakuba njalo Intlalontle ayixolisi). Kuluxanduva, cinga ngamaxesha aphindaphindiweyo uHolmes avuma impazamo nanini na umntu esenza, umzekelo, ekunyamalaleni kukaLady Frances Carfax, xa exelela uWatson, Ngaba kufanelekile ukongeza ityala kwiimbali zakho, Watson endimthandayo, inokuba ngumzekelo woko kusithwa kwelifu okwethutyana apho nengqondo elungeleleneyo inokuvezwa.

Kwaye njengesiqhelo, into kwi USherlock Inqaku elinxulumene noko lisenza ukuba sihambe:

Kodwa obona bungqina bunamandla yile. USherlock Holmes akangomatshini obandayo, wokubala, wokuzanelisa. Ukhathalele uWatson. Ukhathalele uNksk. Hudson. Ngokuqinisekileyo unesazela (kwaye njengoko esitsho uMvundla, ukuba akukho nto iyenye, uphawu [lwentlalontle] kukusilela kwesazela). Ngamanye amagama, iHolmes ineemvakalelo- kunye nezinto ezinamathelisiweyo-njengathi sonke. Eyona nto ayilolayo kukubalawula-kwaye ubavumele babonise phantsi kweemeko ezithile.

Ke ngoko unayo: uluvo lweengcali. Ungasifunda sonke isincoko sakhe ngaphaya kwe-io9 , kwaye sikukhuthaza kakhulu ukuba wenze njalo.

Ngeendlela ezininzi, iyavakala into yokuba ababhali benkqubo bafuna ukujonga uSherlock wabo njenge-sociopath; ngomnye wemigca emide yemiboniso okanye iifilimu ezizama ukubamba ubomi beengqondo ezinzima zengqondo yengqondo yehlabathi, zihlala zishiya inkcazo yeklinikhi xa wolula umlinganiswa kunye nebali ukuze lingene koko uninzi lunokufumanisa ukuba ukonwaba ngakumbi kweemvakalelo kumbukeli.

Ucinga ntoni? Ngaba uyavumelana nohlalutyo lukaKonnikova lomlinganiswa? Ngaba sinawo nawaphi na amalungu afundileyo enkcazo anqwenela ukuthetha ngalo mbandela?

(nge io9 (Umfanekiso nge Umabonwakude obhuqayo )